• 05 MAY 19
    • 0

    Is 5G Worth the Risks?

    From Counterpunch.org

    In recent months there”s been a lot of talk about 5G “” the next generation of wireless technology. 5G is being touted as a necessary step to the “internet of things” “” a world in which our refrigerators alert us when we”re low on milk, our baby”s diapers tell us when they need to be changed, and Netflix is available everywhere, all the time. But what we”re not hearing is that evidence-based studies worldwide have clearly established the harmful effects of human exposure to pulsed radiofrequency radiation from cell towers, cell phones and other devices “” and that 5G will make the problem exponentially worse.

    Most people believe that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) carefully assesses the health risks of these technologies before approving them. But in testimony taken by Senator Blumenthal of Connecticut, the FCC admitted it has not conducted any safety studies on 5G.

    Telecom lobbyists assure us that guidelines already in place are adequate to protect the public. Those safety guidelines, however, are based on a 1996 study of how much a cell phone heated the head of an adult-sized plastic mannequin. This is problematic, for at least three reasons:

    + living organisms consist of highly complex and interdependent cells and tissue, not plastic.

    + those being exposed to radiofrequency radiation include fetuses, children, plants, and wildlife “” not just adult male humans.

    + the frequencies used in the mannequin study were far lower than the exposures associated with 5G.


    Read the full article here


    Leave a reply →