• 08 DEC 18
    • 0

    Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact

    Commentary published in the Lancet, Dec 2018 by Priyanka Bandara fromĀ Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (Australia), and David O Carpenter, from the Institute for Health and the Environment, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA.


    As the Planetary Health Alliance moves forward after a productive second annual meeting, a discussion on the rapid global proliferation of artificial electromagnetic fields would now be apt. The most notable is the blanket of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, largely microwave radiation generated for wireless communication and surveillance technologies, as mounting scientific evidence suggests that prolonged exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation has serious biological and health effects. However, public exposure regulations in most countries continue to be based on the guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, which were established in the 1990s on the belief that only acute thermal effects are hazardous. Prevention of tissue heating by radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is now proven to be ineffective in preventing biochemical and physiological interference…SNIP

    Leave a reply →