This posting is not about the Australian Radiation Protection & Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) nor the Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research (ACEBR) but it could well be considering the consistent spin inherent in their information and advice…..
The following is from Dariusz Leszczynski’s blog; Between a Rock and a Hard Place:
SÃ¤teilyturvakeskus (STUK) in Finland: Amateurish radiation protection
In the past, on several occasions, I wrote about the amateurish conduct of STUK experts, those responsible for protecting Finns from the dangers of radiation, any radiation. Links to these posts are here:
STUK in Finland: How trustworthy is information on smart phones and”¦ nuclear power plants”¦
August 10, 2015 ”” Finland”™s STUK is hiding important radiation exposure information from the general public, the Government and the Parliament. What else is being hidden by the arbitrary decisions of STUK staff? How comprehensive and trustworthy is the information we, the general public, ”¦ SNIP
Untruthful statement from Director General of Finland”™s STUK: Scientific arrogance or incompetence?
April 20, 2015 ”” On June 18, 2014, was posted BRHP blog “STUK in Finland misinforms the Government, Parliamentarians and the general public”. In this posts I criticized STUK for providing false information on radiation exposures caused by the ”˜smart”™ phones: “The experts form ”¦ SNIP
STUK in Finland misinforms the Government, Parliamentarians and the general public SNIP
SNIPLeave a reply →