• 07 MAR 10
    • 0

    #1229: Correction to last message on the Sharesa Price brain tumour case

    Robert Reidlinger points out that the Sharesa Price brain tumour case was a workers compensation claim and not a claim against the cell phone company. The judge awarded her $30,000 to pay her medical bills and other expenses. The importance, even though it was such a small amount, is that it set a legal precedent that cell phone radiation could cause a brain tumour. That’s why according to Robert that the industry is fighting so hard to not have the science heard in the class action lawsuits.

    Links to a few articles on the 2008 Sharesa Price brain tumour case:

    http://www.articlesbase.com/diseases-and-conditions-articles/brain-tumor-brings
    -court-victory-for-a-cell-phone-user-384221.html

    http://www.brain-surgery.us/mobph.pdf

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/health/sfl-otumor02oct02,0,2345506.story

    http://earthcaresolutions.net/science.htm

    Leave a reply →