Here are slides of my lecture Leszczynski New Zealand Lectures November 2019 at the Auckland University, Nov. 19, 2019. 5G AND HEALTH –IS IT SAFE? WHAT THE SCIENCE TELLS US
2)Asking the right questions: Guest Blog from Julius Gorm Graakjær Grantzau, former member of The Danish Parliament
November 23, 2019
Below is the next in a series of Guest Blogs on BRHP. The opinions expressed in this Guest Blog are of Julius Gorm Graakjær Grantzau himself. Publication of these opinions in BRHP does not imply that BRHP automatically agrees with or endorses these opinions. Publication of this, and other guest blogs, facilitates an open debate and free exchange of opinions on wireless technology and health.
Julius Gorm Graakjær Grantzau, is a self-employed entrepreneur, IT-consultant, former member of The Danish Parliament.
5G is being rolled out across the country and the world with rapid speed and high priority, governments are part of removing any barriers, that would exist (e.g. approvals when placing transmitters in the public domain) and nobody can explain, why we are going to have 5G (and why it’s a rush). Furthermore, 5G is being rolled out before there is any standard for, what 5G is (and no standards means no approvals). Calling it 5G is deceptive, as it is NOT simply an upgrade or natural development of existing technology, which it may sound like (from 3-4-5G). But that is the way, the industry made the politicians believe, that this 5G is not something they have to think about. A part of the 5G network is, among other things, satellites that has to make sure, that every square inch of earth is covered. SNIP
3) Leszczynski: presentation at the Victoria University in Wellington
November 27, 2019
Here are slides of my lecture at the Rutherford House Lecture Theatre 1 (RHLT1), Pipitea Campus, Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, Nov. 27, 2019
In my lectures, I am presenting science with all its limitations. I am trying to educate listeners that not every peer-reviewed study is a good quality study. That the design of the study may, and will, pre-determine the outcome of the study. Also, I am often pointing out that not every study is useful, or of value, for determining human health policies.
However, I found it interesting that there are listeners, who come to me after lectures, and complain that my opinions are not good ones because some other scientist(s) think differently and claim that there is plenty of studies proving health harm. Hence, in the listener’s opinion, my opinions, claiming lack of sufficient evidence to prove health harm due to exposures to wireless radiation, are incorrect.
However, when I ask these listeners what education and expertise they have to scientifically judge which of the expert opinions is the correct one, they are often offended.
But this is a simple fact life. How, non-scientist with no education in this area of research, can decide which scientific expert opinion is correct? It seems that the only way the non-scientists make judgement is based on whether scientist’s opinion fits/agrees with their existing already belief what the heath hazard is, instead of listening with the open mind.
4) Leszczynski’s lecture in Nelson, New Zealand
November 29, 2019
Slides of my presentation in Nelson, New Zealand, Nov. 29, 2019 (Leszczynski New Zealand Lecture Nelson November 2019). Note, each presentation in New Zealand is slightly different.