The inconvenient truth about cancer and mobile phones
The Guardian
We dismiss claims about mobiles being bad for our health “” but is that because studies showing a link to cancer have been cast into doubt by the industry?
Eleven independent scientists spent three days at Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, discussing the study, which was done by the National Toxicology Program of the US Department of Health and Human Services and ranks among the largest conducted of the health effects of mobile phone radiation. NTP scientists had exposed thousands of rats and mice (whose biological similarities to humans make them useful indicators of human health risks) to doses of radiation equivalent to an average mobile user”s lifetime exposure.
The peer review scientists repeatedly upgraded the confidence levels the NTP”s scientists and staff had attached to the study, fuelling critics” suspicions that the NTP”s leadership had tried to downplay the findings. Thus the peer review also found “some evidence” “” one step below “clear evidence” “” of cancer in the brain and adrenal glands.
Not one major news organisation in the US or Europe reported this scientific news. But then, news coverage of mobile phone safety has long reflected the outlook of the wireless industry. For a quarter of a century now, the industry has been orchestrating a global PR campaign aimed at misleading not only journalists, but also consumers and policymakers about the actual science concerning mobile phone radiation. Indeed, big wireless has borrowed the very same strategy and tactics big tobacco and big oil pioneered to deceive the public about the risks of smoking and climate change, respectively. And like their tobacco and oil counterparts, wireless industry CEOs lied to the public even after their own scientists privately warned that their products could be dangerous, especially to children.
SNIP
*********************************************************************************************
Leave a reply →