logo
  • Blog
  • Papers/Publications
    • View All
    • The Swedish No Risk Project
  • Links
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Papers/Publications
    • View All
    • The Swedish No Risk Project
  • Links
  • Contact
  • Facebook

In Peer-Review we trust? Do peer-review journals perpetuate bad science

  • Home
  •  
  • In Peer-Review we trust? Do peer-review journals perpetuate bad science
    • 14 FEB 12
    • 0

    In Peer-Review we trust? Do peer-review journals perpetuate bad science

    The latest from Dariusz Leszczynski:

    In Peer-Review we trust? Do peer-review journals perpetuate bad science

    Excerpt:
    HELSINKI, Finland, February 13, 2012″”A recent look at the Danish Cohort and the Greek proteomics study brought to light the eternal problem of the quality of peer-review in scientific journals. Should we trust in peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals or should we not?

    As a journal editor who asked scientist to perform peer-review of manuscripts submitted for publication, and a scientist continuously conducting peer-reviews at the request of the various journals, I suggest caution in reading these articles.

    There are no perfect studies. It is always possible to improve on findings and get more information. However, it does not mean that existing studies, even without improvements, are bad studies. They generally are adequate, good or very good.

    Snip

    For the full article:

    http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/between-rock-and-hard-place/2012/feb/13/peer-review-trust-editors-reviewers/

    Leave a reply →
    • Posted in
    • -Mailing List,
    • Peer review problems
    • Posted by
    • EMFacts

Search

Blog Categories

  • -Mailing List
  • 50/60 Hz
  • 5G and beyond
  • A Brave New World: A dystopian high-tech future
  • ACEBR Watch
  • Alternatives to ICNIRP Hegemony
  • America's revolving door between govt. Agencies and corporate America
  • Bioinitiative Report
  • Book reviews/new books of interest
  • Breast cancer and childhood leukaemia
  • Broadband over Power Lines (BPL)
  • Cancer clusters
  • Cell phone addiction
  • Cell phone news
  • Cell Phone Towers
  • Chemical and mould Exposures
  • Community / Citizens Organisations
  • Conferences
  • Corporate influence on Science, government and the military
  • DECT, Wi-FI, and WLAN wireless systems and health
  • Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity
  • Electrosmog effects on birds and bees
  • Epidemiology
  • Fukushima, Chernobyl and ionizing radiation
  • Genetically Modified crops
  • Globalization / Harmonization
  • GMO crops
  • Insomnia
  • Literature reviews
  • Microwave effects on wildlife
  • Miscellaneous
  • On ICNIRP and WHO
  • Peer review problems
  • Plastics and Human Health
  • Publications
  • Smart Meters, appliances, technology and the Internet of Things
  • The Effects of Technology on Children
  • The Science Media Centre model of science communication
  • Tobacco science and the art of spin
  • Trumpism and the attack on science
  • Wi Fi technology in schools
  • Wind turbine issues

Photostream