Main Menu

  • Web Log Home
  • External Links
  • EMFacts Main Page


  • Browse Categories

    Search Posts


    Subscribe



    Recent Posts
    • 1293: Smart Meters and Smart Regulation (not so smart after all)
    • 1292: Two new papers on bio-effects
    • 1291: WHOs latest RF research agenda - the same old spin
    • 1290: Book review- Going Somewhere by Andrew Marino Ph.D.
    • 1289: Book review: The Shallows: How the Internet is Changing the Way We Think, Read and Remember
    • 1288: Depleted Uranium litigation and The Health Council of the Netherlands (Part II)
    • 1287: Cancer and the depleted uranium controversy (Part I)
    • 1286: The Procrustean Approach is now online
    • 1285: Victorian Govt admits smart meters increase electricity bills
    • 1284: CTIA Sues San Francisco Over Cell Phone Radiation Labeling Law
    • 1283: New book on 'dirty electricity' by Sam Milham
    • 1282: Israeli Health Ministry- Cordless phones emit as much radiation as cell phones
    • 1281:Israeli Health Ministry on DECT phones
    • #1280: Suppression of 'inconvenient' science at the Karolinska Institute
    • #1279: RF effects on Aspen trees



    Archive for April, 2006

    • 30
      • Pylon cancer fears put £7bn blight on house prices
    • 28
      • Telco pre-exemption moves in California - and elsewhere
      • Health Protection Agency - EMF Discussion Group (EMFDG)
    • 27
      • The Science of RFR Health Risks
    • 26
      • ABC on Australian cell phone research: A case of sloppy journalism
    • 24
      • A free and open Internet is under seige
    • 22
      • Notice from Olle Johansson re: articles
    • 21
      • New “peer reviewed” paper exonerates EMF/EMR
    • 20
      • Conference notice: EMF effects on the environment
      • Monitoring kids with GPS cell phones
      • Comment to BMJ article, ‘Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals?’
    • 19
      • Skitzoid logic from the HPA
    • 16
      • Dr David Dowson on electrosensitivity
    • 14
      • DECT / Wi-Fi info leaflet now available
      • U.K. Insurance Firm Offers ‘Home Blight` Insurance
    • 8
      • Comments on FDA’s interpretation problem
    • 7
      • FDA finds Hardell study “difficult to interpret”.
      • Dr. Rosalie Bertell replies to Repacholi’s spin on Chernobyl
    • 5
      • Mobile microwave ovens on the information superhighway
    • 4
      • RCR News reports on Hardell study
      • Electrosensitivity in Canada
    • 1
      • More on the latest Swedish cell phone study
      • Heavy cell phone users face a 240% increased risk of tumours

    Archive & Search using MDV Archive by Nick Momrik.


    This site is powered by WordPress 2.5.