Archive for the 'Corporate influence on Science' Category

July 2010

• 28
  • 1286: The Procrustean Approach is now online
• 21
  • #1280: Suppression of ‘inconvenient’ science at the Karolinska Institute

February 2010

• 9
  • #1212: Risk Is a Four-Letter Word

January 2010

• 23
  • #1202: “Spellcasters”: The Hunt for the “Buy Button” in your Brain
• 8
  • #1189: Part II - That Alzheimer’s study and other “counterintuitive” research findings

December 2009

• 20
  • #1183: The spinning of the brain tumour-cell phone story
• 19
  • #1180: 2 Comments on last message
• 17
  • #1177: Correction to last message
• 16
  • #1176: More on conflict of interest at WHO
• 2
  • #1165: Forgotten lessons: WHO, Big Tobacco and protecting the integrity of WHO decision making

November 2009

• 30
  • #1162: Manufacturing doubt on cellphone hazards
• 27
  • #1160: Perhaps its time for ACRBR to be moved on?

October 2009

• 28
  • #1146: That smell: Verizon now a “strategic partner” with the University of Pittsburgh
• 27
  • #1145: Comments on the University of Pittsburgh, etc.
  • #1144: Something smells rotten in the state of Pennsylvania

November 2008

• 30
  • #996: “NO RISK”: A Trade Union Initiative cut short by Industry
• 28
  • #995: Bushian Science Policy Rules The Day: Risk Assessment in the EC
• 13
  • #982: On institutional loyalties and denial
• 11
  • #980: On institutional conflicts of interests
• 10
  • #978: ACRBR and the invisible thousand pound gorilla

December 2006

• 10
  • #603: New Carlo analysis on the Danish study
• 9
  • #602: BBC News: Industry ‘paid top cancer expert’
• 6
  • #598: Latest Danish cell phone study: Giving the industry what they paid for

November 2006

• 19
  • #591: Repacholi responds to MWN article!
• 16
  • #589: Secret ties to industry and conflicting interests in cancer research
• 14
  • #587: Microwave News on Mike Repacholi as Industry Consultant
• 13
  • #585: Another Repacholi & Co. spin- article in Enviromental Health Perspectives
  • #584: Exit independent EMF research

September 2006

• 23
  • #556: George Monbiot on the denial industry

August 2006

• 9
  • #534: Ultrasound dangers to the developing fetus. Part I
• 8
  • #533: The Political Corruption of Science
• 1
  • #529: Microwave News on “Radiation Research” and the Cult of Negative Studies

July 2006

• 30
  • #528: Comments on corporate corruption
• 24
  • #526: JAMA misled by docs over drug co. ties — again
• 18
  • #524: Corporate Corruption of Science

March 2006

• 7
  • Science communication in the UK hits a low note

February 2006

• 15
  • CSIRO Corporate lackies promise to investigate themselves
  • Endemic political/industrial corruption of science in Australia

October 2005

• 24
  • Corporate Corruption of Science and more

August 2005

• 5
  • Curbing the Influence of the Drug Industry: A British View

June 2005

• 15
  • Holland to set 0.4uT limit for new HVTLs
• 12
  • Many Scientists Admit to Misconduct
• 6
  • Research at mercy of drug firms, study says

May 2005

• 20
  • Big Pharma attack on Aust./ New Zealand supplements