Archive for the 'Cell Phone Towers' Category

July 2010

• 13
  • #1278: Correction to last message
  • #1277: First published review of 10 cellular antenna studies finds adverse health effects

June 2010

• 12
  • #1266: Editorial – Noxious Neighbors

May 2010

• 20
  • #1257: IMPORTANT corrections to last message
  • #1256: Three new papers on GSM Bioeffects

April 2010

• 29
  • #1243: New Report Recommends FCC Require Minimum 1,500 Feet Setbacks for Wireless Infrastructure near Schools

March 2010

• 25
  • #1232: Expert warning on increasing microwave exposures

February 2010

• 11
  • #1214: Telstra caught out with deceptive assurances of safety

January 2010

• 28
  • #1205: GQ Magazine: Warning: Your Cell Phone May Be Hazardous to Your Health
• 10
  • #1191: Bayville school launches lawsuit against nearby cell phone antennas

November 2009

• 25
  • #1159: New Zealand calls for independent review of RF standard

May 2009

• 29
  • #1067: Los Angeles Unified School District Resolution on Cell Antennas
• 25
  • #1065: Text of the Portland City Council resolution
  • #1064: Portland City Council resolution on wireless antennas and health - May 20, 2009 - video

March 2009

• 17
  • #1037: Papers published in latest issue of Pathphysiology
  • #1036: International Scientists Find Harmful Effects from Wireless Technologies
• 9
  • #1033: New paper on health problems near base stations

February 2009

• 19
  • #1021: French court of appeal upholds removal of a base station on health grounds

November 2008

• 24
  • #990: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution
• 11
  • #979: Cell phones and blood-brain barrier - new study

October 2008

• 5
  • #965: Wireless Antennas: People of Color Are Particularly at Risk

September 2008

• 18
  • #947: EMR Australia report on phone towers now available

July 2008

• 21
  • #911: Powerful film on phone masts from New Zealand

January 2008

• 21
  • #845: Important video presentations available at energyfields.org

December 2007

• 7
  • #825: Australian Democrats warning on mobile phone towers

October 2007

• 16
  • #813: Delete last message
• 1
  • #808: The radiation poisoning of America

September 2007

• 18
  • #801: American Trade Unions’ RF Radiation Concerns to be Addressed

July 2007

• 29
  • #778:Important new paper in the Journal of the Royal Institute of Public health
• 18
  • #765: ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (EMF on the agenda)

June 2007

• 18
  • #747: Proposed Playground Cell Tower Nixed By Effective Public Education Campaign In North Idaho
• 12
  • #743: Threat of study if tower goes ahead
  • #742: Ban for Manx Telecom mobile phone masts on the Isle of Man

April 2007

• 30
  • #720: Norfolk [Canada] Doctors Want Tower Moved
• 23
  • #711: Cancer fears over Masts in the UK

October 2006

• 27
  • #575: Radio interview on cell phone health issues
• 14
  • #566: WALES VOTES YES TO PHONE MAST PLANNING SHAKE-UP
• 10
  • #564: Comments invited on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks

September 2006

• 29
  • #559: Direct action against cell tower in Israel
• 21
  • #555: Non-thermal bio-effects found in study of Lookout Mountain residents

August 2006

• 24
  • #541: Court delivers blow against mobile masts

June 2006

• 10
  • #487: Cellphone tower moved because of illness complaints
• 1
  • #485: The wireless society - is it a dangerous trap?

May 2006

• 26
  • Microwave News on RMIT findings
  • Retraction of last message
• 24
  • Still more joys of living under antennas
  • More on living under antennas
  • The joys of living under roof top antennas
• 19
  • # 470: Electrical union to ban work near phone masts
  • #469. Comments from Lachlan Mudge on the RMIT controversy
• 15
  • RMIT comments from Katharina Gustavs
  • RMIT comments from Panayis Zambellis (UK):
• 13
  • RMIT brain tumour controversy: perhaps its not the antennas
• 12
  • More on RMIT brain tumour controversy
• 11
  • BREAKING NEWS: Brain tumour cases prompt uni building closure

April 2006

• 28
  • Telco pre-exemption moves in California - and elsewhere
• 21
  • New “peer reviewed” paper exonerates EMF/EMR
• 14
  • U.K. Insurance Firm Offers ‘Home Blight` Insurance

March 2006

• 22
  • Opposition to cell towers in New York
• 15
  • Is “Mast Hysteria” a deadlier threat than “Bird Flu”?
• 7
  • Science communication in the UK hits a low note

February 2006

• 27
  • IAFF report on cell towers on fire stations

December 2005

• 20
  • Environmental concerns in Israel

November 2005

• 28
  • Over 40 Netherlands councils delaying tower permits
• 20
  • The People’s Will initiative in Sweden
• 14
  • Correction to last message
• 13
  • Dutch NGOs urge Europe to install cellphone antennas far away from dwellings
• 11
  • A (Health) Tale of Two Cities

October 2005

• 29
  • Broadcast radiation health damage links
• 12
  • Telstra forgets about risk warnings in sell-off
• 2
  • A meeting with the UK Solicitor General

September 2005

• 29
  • Cyprus study by Professor Alan Preece
• 28
  • Epilepsy and RF/MW exposure (2 items)
• 26
  • The continuing saga of electrosensitivity in the UK
• 20
  • Has British Labour forgotten the lesson from BSE?
• 19
  • And still more on Hutchinson’s dirty dealings
  • More on Hutchison 3G dirty dealings

August 2005

• 16
  • Spanish paper on RF effects on birds
• 15
  • Canary bird recovers from mobile phone mast exposure
• 2
  • ALGA criticises “new” rules on towers

July 2005

• 31
  • Govt urged to ban mobile phone towers near schools
• 28
  • Aust. Initiatives to address concerns over phone towers
• 25
  • German Doctors unite on RF health effects
• 12
  • Growing resistance against 3G (UMTS) in The Netherlands
• 10
  • Tower rental prices $$$ soar in Australia
• 9
  • Santini on Precautionary Principle & base stations
• 3
  • UK Agency Called in to Look at Phone Mast Health
• 2
  • RF exposure and Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia
• 1
  • Anti-phone mast group fears pupils already sick

June 2005

• 26
  • Correlation found between mobile phone masts and sleep disturbances
• 14
  • Santa brings 3G to New Zealand
  • Tower protests increasing in Australia
• 11
  • FM broadcasting and malignant melanoma incidence
• 6
  • Judge thinks radiation of 3G-mast could possibly be harmful

May 2005

• 25
  • Council rejects Telstra phone tower plan
  • More mobile phone towers planned for Sydney
• 19
  • German expert report confirm effects of mobile telephone radiation
• 18
  • Tower concerns in Australia
• 10
  • Cell phone base stations change EEG patterns

April 2005

• 23
  • Five Studies Showing Ill-Health Effects From Masts

February 2005

• 24
  • PBS TV NOW covers cell tower legal battle; EMF course (From Libby Kelly)