Comments for EMFacts Consultancy http://www.emfacts.com Health issues related to electromagnetic radiation exposure and chemical exposure Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:52:04 +0000 hourly 1 Comment on No opt-out rule for airport body scanners in Australia by JackV http://www.emfacts.com/2012/02/no-opt-out-rule-for-airport-body-scanners-in-australia/#comment-68 JackV Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:52:04 +0000 http://www.emfacts.com/?p=2474#comment-68 Interesting that Albenese says they’re safe (sorry, Perfectly safe which to me means they cannot do harm to anyone). If that’s so then why does SMH report: ”Aside from those with serious medical conditions, any passenger who refuses may be denied the right to board their flight”.? I found this study on the TeraHertz waves that these milliwave body scanners use. http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294 Sounds perfectly safe for the politicians that don’t need to be scanned. Interesting that Albenese says they’re safe (sorry, Perfectly safe which to me means they cannot do harm to anyone).
If that’s so then why does SMH report:
”Aside from those with serious medical conditions, any passenger who refuses may be denied the right to board their flight”.?

I found this study on the TeraHertz waves that these milliwave body scanners use.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294

Sounds perfectly safe for the politicians that don’t need to be scanned.

]]> Comment on Electromagnetic intolerance elucidated by Could High Iron Stores be a Risk Factor for EHS? | EMF Inspirations Blog http://www.emfacts.com/2012/01/electromagnetic-intolerance-elucidated/#comment-67 Could High Iron Stores be a Risk Factor for EHS? | EMF Inspirations Blog Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:05:32 +0000 http://www.emfacts.com/?p=2299#comment-67 [...] new article “Electromagnetic intolerance elucidated,” translated to English on the EMFacts website, provides interesting insights into [...] [...] new article “Electromagnetic intolerance elucidated,” translated to English on the EMFacts website, provides interesting insights into [...]

]]> Comment on Silencing an ‘inconvenient’ voice in the Czech Republic by mbolster http://www.emfacts.com/2012/01/silencing-an-inconvenient-voice-in-the-czech-republic/#comment-66 mbolster Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:33:42 +0000 http://www.emfacts.com/?p=2386#comment-66 "Harmonization" - the word itself smacks of PR brainstorming. More soothing than 'ubiquitous standard'. And given the infinite variety of homo sapiens to be affected, avoids mentioning the evolutionary time lag during which the electro-hypersensitive individuals are culled/rendered non-reproductive until a super race of RF EMF tolerant homo sapiens roams the planet. By which time mobile phones will no doubt have gone out of fashion like 78 rpm records and CD's. But think of the $trillions 'made' meanwhile. “Harmonization” – the word itself smacks of PR brainstorming. More soothing than ‘ubiquitous standard’. And given the infinite variety of homo sapiens to be affected, avoids mentioning the evolutionary time lag during which the electro-hypersensitive individuals are culled/rendered non-reproductive until a super race of RF EMF tolerant homo sapiens roams the planet. By which time mobile phones will no doubt have gone out of fashion like 78 rpm records and CD’s. But think of the $trillions ‘made’ meanwhile.

]]> Comment on Wifi-Free Wednesday by EMFacts http://www.emfacts.com/2011/11/wifi-free-wednesday/#comment-54 EMFacts Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:06:39 +0000 http://www.emfacts.com/?p=2180#comment-54 The old Australian RF standard was a flat 200uW/cm2 limit regardless of frequency. When Aust. officially adopted ICNIRP about 13 years ago, the limits became frequency dependent and so the old GSM limit (at 800-900 Mhz) went from 200uW/cm2 to 450uW/cm2. At 2.4 Ghz the Australian / ICNIRP / and Canadian are all the same at 1000uW/cm2. Don The old Australian RF standard was a flat 200uW/cm2
limit regardless of frequency. When Aust. officially adopted ICNIRP about 13 years ago, the limits became
frequency dependent and so the old GSM limit (at 800-900 Mhz) went from 200uW/cm2 to
450uW/cm2. At 2.4 Ghz the Australian / ICNIRP / and Canadian are all the same at 1000uW/cm2.

Don

]]> Comment on Wifi-Free Wednesday by Colleen http://www.emfacts.com/2011/11/wifi-free-wednesday/#comment-53 Colleen Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:09:13 +0000 http://www.emfacts.com/?p=2180#comment-53 One of the websites given (http://www.stopumts.nl/doc.php/Berichten%20Internationaal/6245/canada_ouders_starten_actie_wifi-free_wednesday) lists the "scientific biological effects that could influence the learning and health of school children" and the levels at which they have been reported to occur. The article then gives the Canadian limit (1000 microW/cm2), which is useful for comparison with the levels of effects. Please can you tell us what limit is applicable in Australia? One of the websites given (http://www.stopumts.nl/doc.php/Berichten%20Internationaal/6245/canada_ouders_starten_actie_wifi-free_wednesday) lists the “scientific biological effects that could influence the learning and health of school children” and the levels at which they have been reported to occur. The article then gives the Canadian limit (1000 microW/cm2), which is useful for comparison with the levels of effects. Please can you tell us what limit is applicable in Australia?

]]>