<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EMFacts Consultancy &#187; Dosimetrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emfacts.com/category/dosimetrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emfacts.com</link>
	<description>Health issues related to electromagnetic radiation exposure and chemical exposure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 02:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>#1240: Indirect proof of strong microwave background radiation</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2010/04/1240-indirect-proof-of-strong-microwave-background-radiation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=1240-indirect-proof-of-strong-microwave-background-radiation</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2010/04/1240-indirect-proof-of-strong-microwave-background-radiation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DECT, Wi-FI, and WLAN wireless systems and health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dosimetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOTE: The following message from Georgiy Ostroumov is a follow-up to his previous message from March 25, 2010, #1232: Expert warning on increasing microwave exposures&#8221; From Georgiy Ostroumov, Ph.D. My article”The most dangerous sources of microwave radiation” had been published (http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1279) and I have received a few questions from different countries. Some people believe that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2010/04/1240-indirect-proof-of-strong-microwave-background-radiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New MW-dosimeter / Study on the Feasibility of Epidemiological Studies on Health Effects of Mobile Telephone Base Stations</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/07/new-mw-dosimeter-study-on-the-feasibility-of-epidemiological-studies-on-health-effects-of-mobile-telephone-base-stations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-mw-dosimeter-study-on-the-feasibility-of-epidemiological-studies-on-health-effects-of-mobile-telephone-base-stations</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/07/new-mw-dosimeter-study-on-the-feasibility-of-epidemiological-studies-on-health-effects-of-mobile-telephone-base-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 21:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[50/60 Hz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell phone news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dosimetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following is a message of interest from Gerd Oberfeld MD: Dear Colleagues, For those who are interested in environmental epidemiology &#8230; a) new MW-dosimeter for GSM900/ GSM1800/DECT/UMTS/WLAN http://www.maschek.de/uk/frameset.php?p=produkte b) Study on the Feasibility of Epidemiological Studies on Health Effects of Mobile Telephone Base Stations &#8211; Final Report http://www.mobile-research.ethz.ch/var/pub_neubauer_pref14.pdf Please distribute this information to people you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/07/new-mw-dosimeter-study-on-the-feasibility-of-epidemiological-studies-on-health-effects-of-mobile-telephone-base-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Draper study: An Australian perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/06/the-draper-study-an-australian-perspective/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-draper-study-an-australian-perspective</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/06/the-draper-study-an-australian-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 05:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[50/60 Hz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dosimetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Grant, scientific director of Leukemia Research said that the observed increase in leukemia risk for those living at distances greater than 60 m from a high voltage power line was most unlikely to be due to any residual electromagnetic field, or other exposures related to the power line. Therefore he thought that“It cannot be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/06/the-draper-study-an-australian-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

