<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EMFacts Consultancy &#187; Court actions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emfacts.com/category/court-actions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emfacts.com</link>
	<description>Health issues related to electromagnetic radiation exposure and chemical exposure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 02:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>#1124: Court verdict finds ICRP&#8217;s risk assessment inadequate</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2009/09/1124-court-verdict-finds-icrps-risk-assessment-inadequate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=1124-court-verdict-finds-icrps-risk-assessment-inadequate</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2009/09/1124-court-verdict-finds-icrps-risk-assessment-inadequate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ionizing Radiation: Fukushima, Chernobyl, DU, etc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Richard Bramhall: Verdict based on failure of ICRP risk model On September 10th a Coroner&#8217;s jury in the West Midlands found that depleted Uranium caused the fatal cancer of a soldier &#8211; Lance Corporal Stuart Dyson &#8211; who served in Iraq during the 1991 Gulf War. Professor Chris Busby, scientific adviser to the LLRC [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2009/09/1124-court-verdict-finds-icrps-risk-assessment-inadequate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#786: Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Award for RF Radiation Injury Below Thermal Exposure Level</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2007/08/786-alaska-supreme-court-upholds-award-for-rf-radiation-injury-below-thermal-exposure-level/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=786-alaska-supreme-court-upholds-award-for-rf-radiation-injury-below-thermal-exposure-level</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2007/08/786-alaska-supreme-court-upholds-award-for-rf-radiation-injury-below-thermal-exposure-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 22, 2007 Contact: Janet Newton &#8211; The EMR Policy Institute Tel: (802) 426-3035 Email: JNewton@emrpolicy.org Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Award for RF Radiation Injury Below Thermal Exposure Level The Alaska Supreme Court (Court) upheld the decision of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) awarding an AT&#038;T equipment installer 100% disability as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2007/08/786-alaska-supreme-court-upholds-award-for-rf-radiation-injury-below-thermal-exposure-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French Telco sues activist for slander</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/07/france/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=france</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/07/france/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following message from France illustrates just how the French Telcoms have to learn about the art of &#8220;community consultation&#8221; and trying to maintain a good corporate image with the public. If, in the UK or Australia, a telco went ahead and sued a community activist group spokesperson for supposedly slandering the company, that would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/07/france/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge thinks radiation of 3G-mast could possibly be harmful</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/06/judge-thinks-radiation-of-3g-mast-could-possibly-be-harmful/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=judge-thinks-radiation-of-3g-mast-could-possibly-be-harmful</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/06/judge-thinks-radiation-of-3g-mast-could-possibly-be-harmful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court actions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Press release, to be forwarded and printed Information: Frans van Velden, ++31 70 3820525, fransp@dds.nl &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Judge thinks radiation of 3G-mast could possibly be harmful June 5, 2005 &#8211; A judge of the court of Almelo (The Netherlands) has rejected the demands of Vodafone Libertel, a provider of mobile telephone services. The judge said it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/06/judge-thinks-radiation-of-3g-mast-could-possibly-be-harmful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Move to force FCC to study RF health effects</title>
		<link>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/05/move-to-force-fcc-to-study-rf-health-effects/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=move-to-force-fcc-to-study-rf-health-effects</link>
		<comments>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/05/move-to-force-fcc-to-study-rf-health-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 06:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EMFacts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court actions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notice from the U.S. EMF Policy Institute: The EMR Policy Institute is seeking donations to support a Supreme Court challenge to the FCC&#8217;s RF safety regulations (press release below). For those wishing to make a donation go to: < www.emrpolicy.org > and click on the &#8220;Donate Now&#8221; button at the bottom of our Home Page. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emfacts.com/2005/05/move-to-force-fcc-to-study-rf-health-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

